<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for No MTBF</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nomtbf.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nomtbf.com</link>
	<description>A site devoted to the eradication of the misuse of MTBF</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:19:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MTBF free Availability by Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://nomtbf.com/2009/05/mtbf-free-availability/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomtbf.com/?p=67#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much for the great information. I always love to read more about the industry. 
Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for the great information. I always love to read more about the industry.<br />
Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What should we use instead of MTBF? by Bjarni Ellert Ísleifsson, CMRP</title>
		<link>http://nomtbf.com/2011/10/what-instead-mtbf/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Bjarni Ellert Ísleifsson, CMRP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 03:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomtbf.com/?p=83#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Hi Fred,

Thank you very much for the like on my post : http://bjarniis.wordpress.com/2012/01/08/logic-will-get-you-from-a-to-b-imagination-will-take-you-everywhere-albert-einstein/ 

I would like to say I like that you would like to focus on positives rather than negatives. Uptime (reliability) is positive MTBF is a negative measure. 

However these are almost inverted measures that would almost mean the same if presented correctly... For example, we only have 2% MTBF, or we have a impressive 98% reliability!

I would definitely select tha latter to present to my customers.

Thank you again for your contribution to the great world of reliability.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Fred,</p>
<p>Thank you very much for the like on my post : <a href="http://bjarniis.wordpress.com/2012/01/08/logic-will-get-you-from-a-to-b-imagination-will-take-you-everywhere-albert-einstein/" rel="nofollow">http://bjarniis.wordpress.com/2012/01/08/logic-will-get-you-from-a-to-b-imagination-will-take-you-everywhere-albert-einstein/</a> </p>
<p>I would like to say I like that you would like to focus on positives rather than negatives. Uptime (reliability) is positive MTBF is a negative measure. </p>
<p>However these are almost inverted measures that would almost mean the same if presented correctly&#8230; For example, we only have 2% MTBF, or we have a impressive 98% reliability!</p>
<p>I would definitely select tha latter to present to my customers.</p>
<p>Thank you again for your contribution to the great world of reliability.  <img src='http://nomtbf.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

